FAFS Position Statement on Open Records
in regards to S611, A752
In 2007, FAFS conducted a survey
of licensed resource families and adoptive families throughout
Children adopted from the foster
care system often have difficult histories.
The stories of heart-warming reunification of adoptees
and their birth parents who gave them up at a time when unwed pregnancy was
frowned upon are not our children’s stories.
There is often difficult information involving drugs, jail, violence,
neglect, and even death of a sibling in our children’s pasts. Parental rights are not terminated lightly or
for small infractions in parenting skills.
Adoption summaries are given to the adoptive parents prior to the
adoption consent. However, they are not
written with the focus on helping the child to process and deal with this
information. We question who will write
the DYFS summaries for the child? Will
they be sensitive in their wording to the needs of these young adults? Learning difficult information or reaching
out to birthparents who may still be dealing with many of the same issues that
caused the state to terminate their parental rights may prove emotionally
devastating to some of our children.
Foster parents adopting children from foster care usually have this
information prior to the adoption consent.
It is their role as parents to determine how and when to best share this
information with their child. As the
state is already recognizing, many of our children are not ready for the full
responsibilities of adulthood at age 18.
For instance, you cannot drink alcohol legally in
FAFS believes that the most
important priority for a child is to have a forever home. In the 2007 FAFS survey, a majority of
resource parents indicated that if post-adoption contact with birth families
were mandated, it would have had a negative impact on their willingness to
adopt through the Child Welfare system.
Our children in foster care need permanency. FAFS is concerned that opening of records may
serve as a barrier to children awaiting a forever family. There are currently hundreds of children
legally free for adoption in
Although the intent of the laws sealing birth records were not to guarantee anonymity to the birth families, in actual practice and perception, this has been the effect. An Open Records bill should provide enough time to notify birth parents regarding the change in the law, enough money to advertise the change, and enough time to respond for those who request nondisclosure. Birth parents need to be made aware of the change in the law and given an adequate opportunity to opt out should they wish to remain anonymous.
The opening of birth records can also be problematic because it means deciding whose rights are paramount, the biological parents, the adoptive parents, or the adoptees? Historically, FAFS supported the promotion of the existing mutual consent registry and education of adoptive parents as to the importance of sharing information as a compromise in the question of whose rights are paramount. Because of our constituent’s support of an adoptee’s right to identifying information, FAFS has dropped our push towards expansion of the mutual registry.
FAFS believes that an open records bill that allowed access to the original birth certificate and/or a DYFS summary at the age of 21 and that allocated enough time and money to the notification of birthparents as to their right to request non-disclosure would reflect the needs of all members of the adoption triad.